Introduction to Biodiversity
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Referencias
1. Ament-Velásquez, S.L.; Gilchrist, C.; Rêgo, A.; Bendixsen, D.P.; Brice, C.; Grosse-Sommer, J.; Rafati, N.; Stelkens, R. The dynamics of adaptation to stress from standing genetic variation and de novo mutations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2022, 39(11), msac242. doi:10.1093/molbev/msac242.
2. Beger, M.; Metaxas, A.; Balbar, A.C.; McGowan, J.A.; Daigle, R.; Kuempel, C.D.; Treml, E.A.; Possingham, H.P. Demystifying ecological connectivity for actionable spatial conservation planning. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2022, 37(12), 1079–1091. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2022.09.002.
3. Brander, L.M.; de Groot, R.; Schägner, J.P.; Guisado-Goñi, V.; van ’t Hoff, V.; McVittie, A.; et al. Economic values for ecosystem services: A global synthesis and way forward. Ecosyst. Serv. 2024, 66, 101606. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101606.
4. Bridges, T.S.; et al. Engineering With Nature: An Atlas, Volume 2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2021.
5. Cares, E.; et al. Investigating the implementation of the mitigation hierarchy approach in EIA. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2023, 98, 106963. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2023.106963.
6. Chen, C.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y. Stability of ecological systems: A theoretical review. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1088, 1–41. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.08.004.
7. Chapman, M.; Xu, L.; Lapeyrolerie, M.; Boettiger, C. Bridging adaptive management and reinforcement learning for more robust decisions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2023, 378(1881), 20220195. doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0195.
8. Claeson, S.M.; LeRoy, C.J.; Finn, D.S.; Stancheva, R.H.; Wolfe, E.R. Variation in riparian and stream assemblages across the primary succession landscape of Mount St. Helens, U.S.A. Freshw. Biol. 2021, 66(5), 1002–1017. doi:10.1111/fwb.13694.
9. Dias, A.M.S.; Cook, C.; Massara, R.L.; Paglia, A.P. Are Environmental Impact Assessments effectively addressing the biodiversity issues in Brazil? Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2022, 95, 106777. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106777.
10. Droste, N.; Alkan Olsson, J.; Hanson, H.; Knaggård, Å.; Lima, G.; Lundmark, L.; Thoni, T.; Zelli, F. A global overview of biodiversity offsetting governance. J. Environ. Manage. 2022, 316, 115231. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115231.
11. Dussex, N.; Morales, H.E.; Grossen, C.; Dalén, L.; van Oosterhout, C. Purging and accumulation of genetic load in conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2023, 38(10), 961–969. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.05.008.
12. Giakoumi, S.; et al. Advances in systematic conservation planning to meet global biodiversity goals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2024.12.002.
13. Estrada-Villegas, S.; Stevenson, P.R.; López, O.; DeWalt, S.J.; Comita, L.S.; Dent, D.H. Animal seed dispersal recovery during passive restoration in a forested landscape. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2023, 378(1867), 20210076. doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0076.
14. Fischman, H.S.; Cromwell, C.W.; Morton, J.P.; Temmink, R.J.M.; van der Heide, T.; Adams, P.N.; Angelini, C. Leveraging successional facilitation to improve restoration of foundational dune grasses. Restor. Ecol. 2024, 32(7), e14207. doi:10.1111/rec.14207.
15. Florentine, S.; Gibson-Roy, P.; Dixon, K.W.; Broadhurst, L. (Eds.). Ecological Restoration: Moving Forward Using Lessons Learned. Springer, 2023. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25412-3.
16. Ferreira, C.S.S.; Kalantari, Z.; Hartmann, T.; Pereira, P. (Eds.). Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation. Springer, 2021/2023. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77505-6.
17. Fuhrmann, N.; Prakash, C.; Kaiser, T.S. Polygenic adaptation from standing genetic variation allows rapid ecotype formation. eLife 2023, 12, e82824. doi:10.7554/eLife.82824.
18. González-del-Pliego, P.; Galiana, N.; González-Trujillo, J.D.; Mestre, F.; Bastazini, V.A.G.; Araújo, M.B. Are threatened species important for glueing interaction networks together? Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 2024, 22(4), 342–347. doi:10.1016/j.pecon.2024.11.003.
19. Gui, W.; Wen, Q.; Dong, W.; Ran, X.; Yang, X.; Zou, G.; Kong, D. Using natural vegetation succession to evaluate how natural restoration proceeds under different climate in Yunnan, Southwest China. PLoS One 2025, 20(3), e0319420. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0319420.
20. Habibullah, M.S.; Din, B.H.; Tan, S.-H.; Zahid, H. Impact of climate change on biodiversity loss: global evidence. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 29(1), 1073–1086. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15702-8.
21. Hartup, J.; Ockendon, N.; Pettorelli, N. Active versus passive restoration: Forests in the southern Carpathian Mountains as a case study. J. Environ. Manage. 2022, 322, 116003. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116003.
22. Hassan, S.; Sabreena; Ganiee, S.A.; Yaseen, A.; Zaman, M.; Jalil Shah, A.; Ganai, B.A. Unraveling the potential of environmental DNA for deciphering recent advances in plant–animal interactions: A systematic review. Planta 2023, 258, 117. doi:10.1007/s00425-023-04267-0.
23. Hua, F.; Bruijnzeel, L.A.; et al. Forest restoration is being scaled-up globally to deliver critical ecosystem services and biodiversity benefits. Science 2022. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl9885.
24. Kiesecker, J.M.; et al. Aligning ecological compensation policies with the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2023. doi:10.1111/csp2.12859.
25. Lang, I.; Bálint, M.; Schmitt, I. Environmental DNA analysis as an emerging non-destructive method for plant biomonitoring. AoB Plants 2022, 14(4), plac031. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plac031.
26. Liu, Q.; Zhao, W. Plant–soil microbe feedbacks drive seedling establishment during secondary forest succession: The successional stage hypothesis. J. Plant Ecol. 2023, 16(6), rtad021. doi:10.1093/jpe/rtad021.
27. Lohbeck, M.W.M.; Rother, D.C.; Jakovac, C.C. Editorial: Enhancing natural regeneration to restore landscapes. Front. For. Glob. Change 2021, 4, 735457. doi:10.3389/ffgc.2021.735457.
28. Lindner, J.P.; Eberle, U.; Knuepffer, E.; Coelho, C.R.V. Moving beyond land use intensity types: Assessing biodiversity impacts using fuzzy thinking. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2021, 26, 1338–1356. doi:10.1007/s11367-021-01899-w.
29. Lynch, A.J.; Thompson, L.M.; Morton, J.M.; Beever, E.A.; Clifford, M.; Limpinsel, D.; et al. RAD adaptive management for transforming ecosystems. BioScience 2021, 72(1), 45–56. doi:10.1093/biosci/biab091.
30. Mallet, J.; Dapporto, L.; Tobler, A.; Papadopulos, A. Species, concepts of. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (2nd ed.). Elsevier/Academic Press, 2022.
31. Marshall, E.; Southwell, D.; Wintle, B.A.; Kujala, H. A global analysis reveals a collective gap in the transparency of offset policies and how biodiversity is measured. Conserv. Lett. 2024, 17(1), e12987. doi:10.1111/conl.12987.
32. Matsuo, T.; Hiura, T.; Onoda, Y. Vertical and horizontal light heterogeneity along gradients of secondary succession in cool- and warm-temperate forests. J. Veg. Sci. 2022, 33(3), e13135. doi:10.1111/jvs.13135.
33. Mukherjee, M.; Shaw, R. (Eds.). Ecosystem-Based Disaster and Climate Resilience: Integration of Blue–Green Infrastructure in Sustainable Development. Springer Nature, 2021. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4815-1.
34. Nakadai, R.; Suzuki, S.N. Ecological succession revisited from a temporal beta-diversity perspective. For. Ecol. Manage. 2025, 580, 122504. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122504.
35. Newing, H.; Fisher, M.; Brittain, S.; Kenrick, J.; Milner-Gulland, E.J. How can we advance equitable, rights-based conservation? Oryx 2023, 57(3), 273–274. doi:10.1017/S0030605323000418.
36. Nordstrom, S.W.; Hufbauer, R.A.; Olazcuaga, L.; Durkee, L.F.; Melbourne, B.A. How density dependence, genetic erosion and the extinction vortex impact evolutionary rescue. Proc. R. Soc. B 2023, 290, 20231228. doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.1228.
37. Ouyang, S.; Gou, M.; Lei, P.; Liu, Y.; Chen, L.; Deng, X.; et al. Plant functional trait diversity and structural diversity co-underpin ecosystem multifunctionality in subtropical forests. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10(1), 100093. doi:10.1016/j.fecs.2023.100093.
38. Paz, A.; Crowther, T.W.; Maynard, D.S. Functional and phylogenetic dimensions of tree biodiversity reveal unique geographic patterns. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2024, 33(9), e13877. doi:10.1111/geb.13877.
39. Plumptre, A.J.; Butchart, S.H.M.; von Staden, L.; Smith, R.J.; Matimele, H.; Starnes, T.; Brooks, T.M.; et al. Key Biodiversity Areas are proving useful for spatial planning if the criteria are applied correctly. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 2023, 21(3), 263–264. doi:10.1016/j.pecon.2023.07.001.
40. Procknow, D.; Rovedder, A.P.M.; Balestrin Piaia, B.; Camargo, B.; Stefanello, M. de M.; et al. Temporal monitoring of ecological restoration by applied nucleation: A case study in the Pampa, southern Brazil. Ecol. Eng. 2025, 212, 107490. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107490.
41. Raza, S.; et al. Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in agricultural systems: Opportunities and challenges. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 859, 160076. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160076.
42. Robinson, J.G.; LaBruna, D.; O'Brien, T.; Clyne, P.J.; Dudley, N.; Andelman, S.J.; et al. Scaling up area-based conservation to implement the Global Biodiversity Framework's 30×30 target: The role of Nature's Strongholds. PLoS Biol. 2024, 22(5), e3002613. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002613.
43. Rockström, J.; Gupta, J.; Qin, D.; Lade, S.J.; Abrams, J.F.; Andersen, L.S.; et al. Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature 2023, 619, 495–505. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8.
44. Sanders, D.; Frago, E. Ecosystem engineers shape ecological network structure and stability: A framework and literature review. Funct. Ecol. 2024, 38(8), 1683–1699. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.14608.
45. Saleh, M.; Ashqar, H.I.; Alary, R.; Bouchareb, E.M.; Bouchareb, R.; Dizge, N.; Balakrishnan, D. Chapter 5 - Biodiversity for Ecosystem Services and Sustainable Development Goals. In Singh, K., Ribeiro, M.C., Calicioglu, Ö. (Eds.), Biodiversity and Bioeconomy. Elsevier, 2024, pp. 81–110.
46. Sexton, J.P.; Clemens, M.; Bell, N.; Hall, J.; Fyfe, V.; Hoffmann, A.A. Patterns and effects of gene flow on adaptation across spatial scales: Implications for management. J. Evol. Biol. 2024, 37(6), 732–745. doi:10.1093/jeb/voae064.
47. Silliman, B.R.; Hensel, M.J.S.; Gibert, J.P.; Daleo, P.; Smith, C.S.; He, Q.; et al. Harnessing ecological theory to enhance ecosystem restoration. Curr. Biol. 2024, 34(9), R418–R434. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.03.043.
48. Suedel, B.C.; Calabria, J.; Bilskie, M.V.; Byers, J.E.; Broich, K.; McKay, S.K.; Tritinger, A.S.; Woodson, C.B.; Dolatowski, E. Engineering coastal structures to centrally embrace biodiversity. J. Environ. Manage. 2022, 323, 116138. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116138.
49. Turner, P.A.; Seddon, N.; Green, J. Biodiversity outcomes of nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 905767. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.905767.
50. van der Plas, F.; Hennecke, J.; Chase, J.M.; van Ruijven, J.; Barry, K.E. Universal beta-diversity–functioning relationships are neither observed nor expected. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2023, 38(6), 518–528. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.01.008.
51. Wudu, K.; Abegaz, A.; Ayele, L.; et al. The impacts of climate change on biodiversity loss and its remedial measures using nature-based conservation approach: a global perspective. Biodivers. Conserv. 2023, 32(12), 3681–3701. doi:10.1007/s10531-023-02656-1.
52. Wagg, C.; Rottstock, T.; Schmid, B.; Eisenhauer, N. Biodiversity–stability relationships strengthen over time in a long-term grassland experiment. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7755. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35189-2.
53. Wang, X.; et al. How would ecological restoration affect multiple ecosystem service trade-offs? A mine tailings case study. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 149, 110181. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110181.
54. Yang, Q.; Liu, G.; Casazza, M.; Gonella, F.; Yang, Z. Three dimensions of biodiversity: New perspectives and methods. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 131, 108099. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108099.
55. Zhang, Y.; et al. Advancements in mine closure and ecological reclamation: A bibliometric review. Mineral Economics 2023, 3(4), 44. doi:10.3390/mineconomia3040044.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumen
Biodiversity constitutes the foundation of ecological balance and of the services that sustain human life, making its study and conservation fundamental in a context of increasing anthropogenic pressure and climate change. Research in this field has been oriented toward understanding diversity at multiple scales and designing effective conservation strategies. This review article aims to analyze the foundations of biodiversity and its conservation, the importance of genetic, species, and ecosystem diversity, as well as the role of ecological succession in the dynamics of biological communities. It argues that biodiversity, in all its dimensions, ensures resilience and ecosystem functionality, while succession provides the conceptual framework for understanding changes in community composition over time. The review asserts that the loss of diversity at any level weakens the adaptive capacity of natural systems and that successional processes are key to restoration and adaptive management. It concludes that integrating multiscale approaches to biodiversity with an understanding of successional dynamics is essential for designing more effective, sustainable, and adaptive conservation strategies in the face of global change scenarios