1. Aladžić, V.; Kekanović, M.; Miličić, I. Traditional Thick Concrete Floor Slabs – An Obstacle to the Flexibility, Energy Efficiency and Seismic Safety. *Teh. Vjesn.* 2019, 26, 1794–1802. [https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20180419101316](https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20180419101316)
2. Mata-Falcón, J.; Bischof, P.; Huber, T.; Anton, A.; Burger, J.; Ranaudo, F.; Jipa, A.; Gebhard, L.; Reiter, L.; Lloret-Fritschi, E.; et al. Digitally Fabricated Ribbed Concrete Floor Slabs: A Sustainable Solution for Construction. *RILEM Tech. Lett.* 2022, 7, 68–78. [https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2022.161](https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2022.161)
3. Herrera Herrera, A. D. *Optimización del costo del diseño estructural en función de la deriva para edificios de hormigón armado*; Escuela Politécnica Nacional, 2022.
4. Rupidara, Y. A.; Cornelis, R.; Sir, T. M. W. Comparative Analysis of Seismic Performance of Building Structures with Conventional Slab, Waffle Slab, and Flat Slab. *J. FORUM Tek. SIPIL* 2022, 2, 80–91. [https://doi.org/10.35508/forteks.v2i1.5496](https://doi.org/10.35508/forteks.v2i1.5496)
5. Cunalata, F.; Caiza, P. State of the Art of Seismic Vulnerability Studies in Ecuador. *Rev. Politec.* 2022, 50, 55–64. [https://doi.org/10.33333/rp.vol50n1.06](https://doi.org/10.33333/rp.vol50n1.06)
6. La Torre Esquivel, J. E. *Optimización del diseño estructural, enfocado en el costo de edificaciones educativas de concreto armado*; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2018.
7. Baig, M. M.; Rashid, A.; Reddy, Y. P. S. D.; Krishna, T. G. N. V. A Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of G+6 Building with Ribbed Slab & Conventional Slab Using SAP2000 Software. *IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.* 2021, 1112, 012026. [https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1112/1/012026](https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1112/1/012026)
8. Nithyambigai, G.; Rameshwaran, P. M.; Stella Mary, F. Behaviour of Waffle Slab. *Mater. Today Proc.* 2020, 46, 3765–3768. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.016](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.016)
9. Pandey, A. K. Seismic Analysis of Commercial Building with Grid/Waffle Slab Using ETABS. *Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol.* 2021, 9, 679–685. [https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.38486](https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.38486)
10. Robati, M.; McCarthy, T. J.; Kokogiannakis, G. Integrated Life Cycle Cost Method for Sustainable Structural Design by Focusing on a Benchmark Office Building in Australia. *Energy Build.* 2018, 166, 525–537. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.034](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.034)
11. Lima, J. P. dos S. Structural Comparative Analysis Between Conventional Solid Slabs and Reinforced Concrete Ribbed Slabs Through Manual Calculation and TQS Software. *J. Eng. Res.* 2022, 2, 2–16. [https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.3172262222113](https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.3172262222113)
12. Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica (AIS). *AIS 114-17 – Requisitos Esenciales para Edificaciones de Concreto Reforzado de Tamaño y Altura Limitados*; 1st ed.; Bogotá, 2017.
13. Instituto Geográfico Militar del Ecuador. *Base Nacional Escala 1:50 000*; Quito, 2010.
14. Geoplast. *Geoplast Catalogue 2022*; 2022.
15. Alexander, M. G.; Dehn, F.; Moyo, P. *Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting IV*; 2015; ISBN 9780203124253.
16. ANSI American National Standard. *SMPTE J.* 2013, 95, 601–602. [https://doi.org/10.5594/j17740](https://doi.org/10.5594/j17740)
17. Colonia, Y.; Valentin, S. *Análisis comparativo entre el sistema de losa convencional y losa con viguetas prefabricadas en el diseño sísmico de una vivienda en Arequipa*; Universidad César Vallejo, 2020.
18. Sorace, S.; Terenzi, G. Structural Assessment of a Modern Heritage Building. *Eng. Struct.* 2013, 49, 743–755. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.012)