1. UNESCO. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Paris: UNESCO; 2023. doi:10.54675/EWZM9535.
2. Yusuf A, Pervin N, Román-González M, Noor NM. Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review. Review of Education. 2024;12:e3489. doi:10.1002/rev3.3489.
3. Daniel K. Can Generative AI Revolutionise Academic Skills Development in Higher Education? A Systematic Literature Review. European Journal of Education. 2025. doi:10.1111/ejed.70036.
4. Liu J, Sihes AJB, Lu Y. How do generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and large language models (LLMs) influence language learners’ critical thinking in EFL education? A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments. 2025;12:48. doi:10.1186/s40561-025-00406-0.
5. Wang N, Wang X, Su YS. Critical analysis of the technological affordances, challenges and future directions of Generative AI in education: A systematic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 2024;44(1):139-155. doi:10.1080/02188791.2024.2305156.
6. Zhao Y, Yue Y, Sun Z, Jiang Q, Li G. Does Generative Artificial Intelligence Improve Students’ Higher-Order Thinking? A Meta-Analysis Based on 29 Experiments and Quasi-Experiments. Journal of Intelligence. 2025;13(12):160. doi:10.3390/jintelligence13120160.
7. Chen S, Cheung ACK. Effect of generative artificial intelligence on university students learning outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. 2025;49:100737. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100737.
8. Deng R, Jiang M, Yu X, Lu Y, Liu S. Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education. 2025;218:105224. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224.
9. Zhang X, Zhang P, Shen Y, Liu M, Wang Q, Gašević D, Fan Y. A systematic literature review of empirical research on applying generative artificial intelligence in education. Frontiers of Digital Education. 2024;1(3):223-245. doi:10.1007/s44366-024-0028-5.
10. Ruiz-Rojas LI, Salvador-Ullauri L, Acosta-Vargas P. Collaborative working and critical thinking: Adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education. Sustainability. 2024;16(13):5367. doi:10.3390/su16135367.
11. Albadarin Y, Saqr M, Pope N, Tukiainen M, et al. A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education. Discover Education. 2024;3:60. doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00138-2.
12. Sharma H, Stroud D, et al. A systematic review of generative AI for teaching and learning practice. Education Sciences. 2024;14(6):636. doi:10.3390/educsci14060636.
13. Sardi J, Darmansyah, Candra O, Yuliana DF, Habibullah, Yanto DTP, Eliza F. How Generative AI Influences Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Critical Thinking Skills? A Systematic Review. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy. 2025;15(1). doi:10.3991/ijep.v15i1.53379.
14. Balart T, Díaz B, Shryock K. A systematic literature review on the pedagogical implications and impact of GenAI on students’ critical thinking. Algorithms. 2026;19(3):179. doi:10.3390/a19030179.
15. Baig MI, Yadegaridehkordi E. ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Research. 2024;127:102411. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411.